Volume is not protection.
Hundreds of pages of Body Corporate records are being ordered in Queensland property sales that are completely unnecessary, and the seller is footing the bill. Here is what the law actually requires, and why "refer to attached Form 33/34" is not a legal answer.
- Topic
- Statutory warranty disclosure
- Applies to
- Body Corporate sales
- Relevant to
- Agents · Sellers · Solicitors
- Jurisdiction
- Queensland
A costly habit, and a legal gap
A troubling practice has taken hold across Queensland real estate. Agents are routinely ordering hundreds of pages of Body Corporate records, including financial statements, meeting minutes and correspondence files, and attaching them to a contract as supposed evidence of statutory warranty compliance. On the face of it, this looks thorough. In practice, it is legally insufficient and commercially wasteful.
The instruction most commonly seen in contracts reads "refer to attached Form 2" or "refer to attached Form 33/34". Both directions are wrong. Neither satisfies the statutory warranty disclosure requirements under Queensland property law. Buyers and sellers are accepting this, and neither party realises what they are actually agreeing to.
The core problem
The statutory warranty sections (a) through (g) in a Contract of Sale must be individually completed. They cannot be satisfied by attaching a Form 2, a Form 33/34, or any volume of Body Corporate records in their place.
"Refer to attached" is not a legal answer. It is a gap in the contract. Bulk records do not answer the warranty questions. They transfer the burden of reading, interpreting and concluding onto the buyer, which is precisely what the statutory warranty regime was designed to prevent.
What the law actually requires
The statutory warranty regime requires the seller to make specific representations about the property at the time of contract. Sections (a) to (g) are separate warranty items: each stands alone, and each must be completed correctly. Getting even one wrong, leaving it blank, or qualifying it incorrectly is a breach of warranty, and can entitle the buyer to terminate the contract. Each one, on its own terms:
- (a)Body Corporate fees, levies and contributions, including current amounts and arrears status
- (b)Special levies, whether any have been raised or are contemplated
- (c)Body Corporate assets and liabilities, including administrative and sinking fund balances
- (d)Insurance, that Body Corporate insurance is in place and what it covers
- (e)By-laws and rules, including any current or pending by-law amendments
- (f)Exclusive use areas and agreements, including any relevant authorisations or arrangements
- (g)Litigation and disputes, including any current or pending legal proceedings involving the Body Corporate
Each of these items demands a specific, accurate answer, not a document dump that leaves the buyer to draw their own conclusions. A buyer who must read through hundreds of pages to determine whether a special levy exists has not been given a warranty. They have been given a research task.
What a Form 33/34 and Form 2 actually are
A Form 33 (or Form 34 for community titles schemes) is a Body Corporate information certificate, a point-in-time record of contributions, levies and certain financial matters. It is a useful document, but it is not a substitute for the statutory warranty declarations.
A Form 2 is the seller's disclosure statement. It has its own purpose and requirements. Directing a buyer to "refer to Form 2" as an answer to a warranty question answers nothing. It simply redirects the buyer to another document that itself has its own outstanding obligations.
Both documents support disclosure. Neither document replaces it.
The real cost to sellers
Sellers are being charged for records packages they do not need, while simultaneously not receiving the targeted statutory warranty report they do need. The two outcomes combine badly: unnecessary cost, and inadequate compliance.
What agents are ordering
Full Body Corporate records, including minutes, financials and correspondence, often 200 to 400 pages, at significant cost to the seller, providing no additional legal protection and failing to satisfy the warranty requirements.
What is actually needed
A targeted Statutory Warranties Report that directly answers sections (a) to (g), prepared by a qualified Body Corporate search agent. Precise, compliant, and a fraction of the cost of a full records package.
Attaching bulk records and directing a buyer to "refer to attached" does not reduce the seller's exposure. It may increase it. If a warranty item is not clearly addressed and a buyer later suffers loss, the adequacy of the disclosure will be scrutinised. Volume of paper is not evidence of compliance.
What sellers, and their agents, should ask for
Sellers, and the agents and solicitors advising them, should insist on a report that directly and specifically addresses each of the statutory warranty sections. This is not a bulk document exercise. It is a targeted compliance task, and it should be treated as one.
A properly prepared Statutory Warranties Report will address sections (a) through (g) individually, draw on current Body Corporate records, and present the answers in a form that can be incorporated directly into the contract. No guesswork for the buyer. No exposure gap for the seller. No unnecessary cost.
The bottom line
The law requires disclosure, not documentation. Sections (a) to (g) must be completed specifically, accurately and individually. A Form 2 cross-reference is not an answer. A stack of meeting minutes is not an answer.
A properly prepared Statutory Warranties Report is.
Ready to request your report?
Get in touch with our Sunshine Coast based team to discuss your requirements, or request a report through our secure online portal.
Call us on 07 5458 6878